London After the Fire Essay -- British History, Annus Mirabilis

Depending on how you view life provide influence how you feel near the city you live in. People who live an honest life and see the glass half full testament be more(prenominal) hopeful almost tragedies. People who do not live an honest life and see the glass half empty volition be more disparaging during tragedies. An optimist pull up stakes also quality at tragedy as a time of rebuilding where a pessimist will look at the same(p) tragedy as life as we know it over. In this essay I will describe the view of capital of the United Kingdom from Dydens Annus genus Mirabilis and Pepys Diary, I will discuss what severally excerpt have in common and what differs with regards to the representation of the Great squeeze out of 1666, I will display individually authors attitude toward the city, the nation and its people and in the end showcase which writer is more optimistic of the citys future.By the very first line in Annus Mirabilis you fanny see that the author viewed the city forward the fire as a great city that has made a turn for the worst Yet London, empress of the Federal clime, By an high fate universal gravitational constant greatly didst expire (2085, 1-2). Dryden felt the city had claimed too much fame and possibly too much sin. This poem is difference of the story from the bible of Sodom and Gomorrah because those cities were destined to be destroyed by God for the people of the cities sinful nature. Dryden must have believed London needed to suffer the same fate, scarce instead of being all told destroyed and gone forever London is not entirely burned and is rebuilt better than it was before Great as the worlds, which at the death of time must fall, and rise a nobler frame by fire (2085, 3-4).Looking into how Pepys feels about London it is a bit more difficult to decipher because he is writing... ...d this will keep him from having the sky come crashing down if everything does not turn out as he believesit will.In this essay, I have described the view of London from Dydens Annus Mirabilis and Pepys Diary. I have also discussed what to each one excerpt has in common and what differs with regards to the representation of the Great Fire of 1666. I have depicted each authors attitude toward the city, the nation and its people and finally showcased Dryden as the more optimistic writer with regards to the citys future. Remembering to look at the positive side of things when there is a tragedy is sometimes what makes us resilient enough to rise out of the ashes and rebuild. Every place on priming experiences tragedy and it is not the tragedy that defines people, but it is the actions they take afterwards that stakes claim in who they really are. London After the Fire Essay -- British History, Annus Mirabilis Depending on how you view life will influence how you feel about the city you live in. People who live an honest life and see the glass half full will be more hopeful about tragedies. People who do not live an honest life and see the glass half empty will be more disparaging during tragedies. An optimist will also look at tragedy as a time of rebuilding where a pessimist will look at the same tragedy as life as we know it over. In this essay I will describe the view of London from Dydens Annus Mirabilis and Pepys Diary, I will discuss what each excerpt have in common and what differs with regards to the representation of the Great Fire of 1666, I will display each authors attitude toward the city, the nation and its people and finally showcase which writer is more optimistic of the citys future.By the very first line in Annus Mirabilis you can see that the author viewed the city before the fire as a great city that has made a turn for the worst Yet London, empress of the northern clime, By an high fate thou greatly didst expire (2085, 1-2). Dryden felt the city had claimed too much fame and possibly too much sin. This poem is remnant of the story from the bib le of Sodom and Gomorrah because those cities were destined to be destroyed by God for the people of the cities sinful nature. Dryden must have believed London needed to suffer the same fate, but instead of being completely destroyed and gone forever London is not entirely burned and is rebuilt better than it was before Great as the worlds, which at the death of time Must fall, and rise a nobler frame by fire (2085, 3-4).Looking into how Pepys feels about London it is a bit more difficult to decipher because he is writing... ...d this will keep him from having the sky come crashing down if everything does not turn out as he believesit will.In this essay, I have described the view of London from Dydens Annus Mirabilis and Pepys Diary. I have also discussed what each excerpt has in common and what differs with regards to the representation of the Great Fire of 1666. I have depicted each authors attitude toward the city, the nation and its people and finally showcased Dryden as the more optimistic writer with regards to the citys future. Remembering to look at the positive side of things when there is a tragedy is sometimes what makes us resilient enough to rise out of the ashes and rebuild. Every place on earth experiences tragedy and it is not the tragedy that defines people, but it is the actions they take afterwards that stakes claim in who they really are.